Why physical understanding should precede the mathematical formalism - conditional quantum probabilities as a case-study
arXiv:1902.08798 · doi:10.1119/1.5115980
Abstract
Conditional probabilities in quantum systems which have both initial and final boundary conditions are commonly evaluated using the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz rule. In this short note we present a seemingly disturbing paradox that appears when applying the rule to systems with slightly broken degeneracies. In these cases we encounter a singular limit - the probability "jumps" when going from perfect degeneracy to negligibly broken one. We trace the origin of the paradox and solve it from both traditional and modern perspectives in order to highlight the physics behind it: the necessity to take into account the finite resolution of the measuring device. As a practical example, we study the application of the rule to the Zeeman effect. The analysis presented here may stress the general need to first consider the governing physical principles before heading to the mathematical formalism, in particular when exploring puzzling quantum phenomena.
arXiv commentSlightly revised version
References in corpus (14)
- Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities
- An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more)
- Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information-theoretic constraints
- Revisiting Hardy's Paradox: Counterfactual Statements, Real Measurements, Entanglement and Weak Values
- Quantum mechanics is about quantum information
- Pre- and Post-selection paradoxes and contextuality in quantum mechanics
- The Case of the Disappearing (and Re-Appearing) Particle
- The Pondicherry interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Objective probabilities, quantum counterfactuals, and the ABL rule
- Interaction-Free Effects Between Distant Atoms
- Anomalous Weak Values Emerging from Strong Interactions between Light and Matter
- Path integrals, the ABL rule and the three-box paradox
- Comment on "Measurements without probabilities in the final state proposal"