Comment on "Distinct Thresholds for the Initiation and Cessation of Aeolian Saltation From Field Measurements" by Raleigh L. Martin and Jasper F. Kok: Alternative Interpretation of Measured Thresholds as two Distinct Cessation Thresholds
arXiv:1812.05658 · doi:10.1029/2018JF004824
Abstract
Martin and Kok (2018a) measured two distinct aeolian saltation transport thresholds: a larger threshold below which continuous saltation transport becomes intermittent and a smaller threshold below which intermittent saltation transport ceases. In the spirit of Bagnold, they interpreted the former threshold as the \textit{fluid threshold}, associated with transport initiation, and the latter threshold as the \textit{impact threshold}, associated with transport cessation. Here I describe and support an alternative interpretation of these two thresholds as two distinct cessation thresholds associated with splash entrainment and, respectively, with compensating energy losses of rebounding particles. This interpretation was recently proposed by Pähtz and Durán (2018a). To resolve this controversy, further field studies are needed.
References in corpus (7)
- Jump at the onset of saltation
- The Cessation Threshold of Nonsuspended Sediment Transport Across Aeolian and Fluvial Environments
- Fluid forces or impacts: What governs the entrainment of soil particles in sediment transport mediated by a Newtonian fluid?
- The Critical Role of the Boundary Layer Thickness for the Initiation of Aeolian Sediment Transport
- Onset and cessation of motion in hydrodynamically sheared granular beds
- Universal friction law at granular solid-gas transition explains scaling of sediment transport load with excess fluid shear stress
- The role of grain dynamics in determining the onset of sediment transport