Reply to "Presence of a fundamental acceleration scale in galaxies" and "A common Milgromian acceleration scale in nature"
arXiv:1811.05882 · doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0614-x
Abstract
This correspondence answers the criticisms raised in McGaugh et al 2018 and Kroupa et al 2018.
arXiv comment5 pages, 2 figures. Correspondence in Nature Astronomy. See https://rdcu.be/bbl3I for the free access version
References in corpus (5)
- The Radial Acceleration Relation in Rotationally Supported Galaxies
- Reconstructing the stellar mass distributions of galaxies using S4G IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 micron images: II. The conversion from light to mass
- Fitting the radial acceleration relation to individual SPARC galaxies
- Absence of a fundamental acceleration scale in galaxies
- A common Milgromian acceleration scale in nature
Cited by in corpus (14)
- The radial acceleration relation in galaxy clusters
- Is there a fundamental acceleration scale in galaxies?
- Yet another test of Radial Acceleration Relation for galaxy clusters
- On the Presence of a Universal Acceleration Scale in Elliptical Galaxies
- A fundamental test for MOND
- Normalized additional velocity distribution: testing the radial profile of dark matter halos and MOND
- A cautionary tale in fitting galaxy rotation curves with Bayesian techniques: does Newton's constant vary from galaxy to galaxy?
- Dynamics of DiskMass Survey galaxies in refracted gravity
- A test of constancy of dark matter halo surface density and radial acceleration relation in relaxed galaxy groups
- A test of Radial Acceleration Relation for the {\it Giles et al Chandra} cluster sample
- Reply to: Overconfidence in Bayesian analyses of galaxy rotation curves
- Dark Coincidences: Small-Scale Solutions with Refracted Gravity and MOND
- The radial acceleration relation and its emergent nature
- A Toy Model for the Dynamical Discrepancies on Galactic Scales