About Wigner Friend's and Hardy's paradox in a Bohmian approach: a comment of `Quantum theory cannot' consistently describe the use of itself'

Abstract

This is an analysis of the recently published article `Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself' by D. Frauchiger and R. Renner~\cite{1}. Here I decipher the paradox and analyze it from the point of view of de Broglie-Bohm hidden variable theory (i.e., Bohmian mechanics). I also analyze the problem from the perspective obtained by the Copenhagen interpretation (i.e., the Bohrian interpretation) and show that both views are self consistent and do not lead to any contradiction with a `single-world' description of quantum theory.

arXiv commentnew version including some corrections for figures 3 and 4

References in corpus (1)

• Relational Quantum Mechanics

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Physics and Metaphysics of Wigner's Friends: Even performed pre-measurements have no results
• Agents governed by quantum mechanics can use it intersubjectively and consistently
• Wigner Friend scenarios with non-invasive weak measurements
• A general quantum circuit framework for Extended Wigner's Friend Scenarios: logically and causally consistent reasoning without absolute measurement events
• Wigner's convoluted friends
• On the paper "Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself"
• Defending Quantum Objectivity