Testing Causal Quantum Theory
arXiv:1807.09663 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2018.0501
Abstract
Causal quantum theory assumes that measurements or collapses are well-defined physical processes, localised in space-time, and never give perfectly reliable outcomes and that the outcome of one measurement only influences the outcomes of others within its future light cone. Although the theory has unusual properties, it is not immediately evident that it is inconsistent with experiment to date. I discuss its implications and experimental tests.
arXiv commentAccepted manuscript. Errors corrected
References in corpus (13)
- Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
- Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions
- Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons
- A strong loophole-free test of local realism
- Models of Wave-function Collapse, Underlying Theories, and Experimental Tests
- Violation of Bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart
- Bell violation with entangled photons, free of the fair-sampling assumption
- Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits
- Quantum nonlocality, Bell inequalities and the memory loophole
- Space-like Separation in a Bell Test assuming Gravitationally Induced Collapses
- Causal Quantum Theory and the Collapse Locality Loophole
- Bell inequality and the locality loophole: Active versus passive switches
- Stronger Tests of the Collapse Locality Loophole in Bell Experiments