Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects

Abstract

Linear regressions with period and group fixed effects are widely used to estimate treatment effects. We show that they estimate weighted sums of the average treatment effects (ATE) in each group and period, with weights that may be negative. Due to the negative weights, the linear regression coefficient may for instance be negative while all the ATEs are positive. We propose another estimator that solves this issue. In the two applications we revisit, it is significantly different from the linear regression estimator.

First version: March 2018. 71 pages (main paper until page 36, then supplement)

Cited by in corpus (15)

• Nothing to See Here? A non-inferiority approach to parallel trends
• Difference-in-Differences Estimation with Spatial Spillovers
• Contamination Bias in Linear Regressions
• Testing for equivalence of pre-trends in Difference-in-Differences estimation
• Causal Panel Analysis under Parallel Trends: Lessons from a Large Reanalysis Study
• Labour by Design: Contributions of David Card, Joshua Angrist, and Guido Imbens
• Model-assisted analysis of covariance estimators for stepped wedge cluster randomized experiments
• Analysing the causal effect of London cycle superhighways on traffic congestion
• Identifying and estimating effects of sustained interventions under parallel trends assumptions
• Design-Robust Two-Way-Fixed-Effects Regression For Panel Data
• Effects of thermal inversion induced air pollution on COVID-19
• Dynamic Causal Effects in a Nonlinear World: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
• Religious Competition, Cultural Change, and Domestic Violence: Evidence from Colombia
• Statistical Power for Estimating Treatment Effects Using Difference-in-Differences and Comparative Interrupted Time Series Designs with Variation in Treatment Timing
• How firms, bureaucrats, and ministries benefit from the revolving door: Evidence from Japan