Evidence of Open Access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: a large-scale analysis
arXiv:1803.06161 · doi:10.1016/J.JOI.2018.06.012
Abstract
This article uses Google Scholar (GS) as a source of data to analyse Open Access (OA) levels across all countries and fields of research. All articles and reviews with a DOI and published in 2009 or 2014 and covered by the three main citation indexes in the Web of Science (2,269,022 documents) were selected for study. The links to freely available versions of these documents displayed in GS were collected. To differentiate between more reliable (sustainable and legal) forms of access and less reliable ones, the data extracted from GS was combined with information available in DOAJ, CrossRef, OpenDOAR, and ROAR. This allowed us to distinguish the percentage of documents in our sample that are made OA by the publisher (23.1%, including Gold, Hybrid, Delayed, and Bronze OA) from those available as Green OA (17.6%), and those available from other sources (40.6%, mainly due to ResearchGate). The data shows an overall free availability of 54.6%, with important differences at the country and subject category levels. The data extracted from GS yielded very similar results to those found by other studies that analysed similar samples of documents, but employed different methods to find evidence of OA, thus suggesting a relative consistency among methods.
38 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables. Complementary materials available at https://osf.io/fsujy/
References in corpus (5)
- Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?
- Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar
- Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline
- A two-sided academic landscape: portrait of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar (1950-2013)
- Developing indicators on Open Access by combining evidence from diverse data sources
Cited by in corpus (12)
- What happens when a journal converts to Open Access? A bibliometric analysis
- ResearchGate and Google Scholar: How much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?
- Measuring open access publications: a novel normalized open access indicator
- Transparency to hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata: An article-level study of Elsevier
- How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements?
- The Case of Significant Variations in Gold-Green and Black Open Access: Evidence from Indian Research Output
- Indicators of Open Access for universities
- Open Access Improves the Dissemination of Science: Insights from Wikipedia
- Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German university landscape (2010-2020). Part 1: journal-based OA
- Libros en abierto de las editoriales universitarias españolas
- Integrating measures of replicability into scholarly search: Challenges and opportunities
- Emerging trends and collaboration patterns unveil the scientific production in blockchain technology: A bibliometric and network analysis from 2014-2020