Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline
arXiv:1206.3664
Abstract
Most refereed journal articles today are published in subscription journals, accessible only to subscribing institutions, hence losing considerable research impact. Making articles freely accessible online ("Open Access," OA) maximizes their impact. Articles can be made OA in two ways: by self-archiving them on the web ("Green OA") or by publishing them in OA journals ("Gold OA"). We compared the percent and growth rate of Green and Gold OA for 14 disciplines in two random samples of 1300 articles per discipline out of the 12,500 journals indexed by Thomson-Reuters-ISI using a robot that trawled the web for OA full-texts. We sampled in 2009 and 2011 for publication year ranges 1998-2006 and 2005-2010, respectively. Green OA (21.4%) exceeds Gold OA (2.4%) in proportion and growth rate in all but the biomedical disciplines, probably because it can be provided for all journals articles and does not require paying extra Gold OA publication fees. The spontaneous overall OA growth rate is still very slow (about 1% per year). If institutions make Green OA self-archiving mandatory, however, it triples percent Green OA as well as accelerating its growth rate.
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness
- Open access in Europe: a national and regional comparison
- Do Authors Deposit on Time? Tracking Open Access Policy Compliance
- Green open access in computer science - an exploratory study on author-based self-archiving awareness, practice, and inhibitors
- Could freely available articles reduce faculty reliance on library for access? An analysis of items cited by faculty from Singapore Management University
- Waiving Article Processing Charges for Least Developed Countries. A Brick Stone of a Large-scale Open Access Transformation