Importance of initial conditions in the polarization of complex networks

Abstract

Currently used models of opinion formation use random initial conditions. In reality, most people in a social network, except for a small fraction of the population, are initially either unaware of, or indifferent to, the disputed issue. To explore the consequences of such specific initial conditions, we study the polarization of social networks when conflicting ideas arise on two different seed nodes and then spread according to a majority rule. Using the configuration model and the stochastic block model as examples, we show that this framework leads to substantially different outcomes than those which employ random initial conditions. Moreover, the empirically observed splits in the karate and the dolphins' networks naturally come out of this paradigm. Our work thus suggests that the existing opinion dynamics models should be reevaluated to incorporate the initial condition dependence.

Removed 1 figure, the final version

References in corpus (13)

• Modularity and community structure in networks
• Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure
• Statistical physics of social dynamics
• Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks
• Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks
• Community detection in networks: A user guide
• Statistical physics of human cooperation
• Parsimonious module inference in large networks
• Efficient method for estimating the number of communities in a network
• A new model of binary opinion dynamics: coarsening and effect of disorder
• Metric clusters in evolutionary games on scale-free networks
• Fixation and Polarization in a Three-Species Opinion Dynamics Model
• Large order fluctuations, switching, and control in complex networks