Probing the limits of the rigid-intensity-shift model in differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy

Abstract

The rigid-intensity-shift model of differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy (DPC-STEM) imaging assumes that the phase gradient imposed on the probe by the sample causes the diffraction pattern intensity to shift rigidly by an amount proportional to that phase gradient. This behaviour is seldom realised exactly in practice. Through a combination of experimental results, analytical modelling and numerical calculations, we explore the breakdown of the rigid-intensity-shift behaviour and how this depends on the magnitude of the phase gradient and the relative scale of features in the phase profile and the probe size. We present guidelines as to when the rigid-intensity-shift model can be applied for quantitative phase reconstruction using segmented detectors, and propose probe-shaping strategies to further improve the accuracy.

13 pages

References in corpus (1)

• Theory and applications of free-electron vortex states

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Interpretable and efficient contrast in scanning transmission electron microscopy with a diffraction grating beamsplitter
• Assessment of active dopants and p-n junction abruptness using in-situ biased 4D-STEM
• High-sensitivity mapping of magnetic induction fields with nanometer-scale resolution: comparison of off-axis electron holography and pixelated differential phase contrast
• Factors limiting quantitative phase retrieval in atomic-resolution differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy using a segmented detector
• Suppressing dynamical diffraction artefacts in differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy of long-range electromagnetic fields via precession
• Parallel mode differential phase contrast in transmission electron microscopy, I: Theory and analysis