Calculation of Ligand Dissociation Energies in Large Transition-Metal Complexes
arXiv:1801.06584 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00061
Abstract
Despite the importance of ligand dissociation energies for computational chemistry, obtaining accurate ab initio reference data is difficult and density-functional methods of uncertain reliability are chosen for feasibility reasons. Here, we consider advanced coupled-cluster and multi-configurational approaches to reinvestigate our WCCR10 set of ten gas-phase ligand dissociation energies. We assess the potential multi-configurational character of all molecules involved in these reactions in order to determine where single-reference coupled-cluster approaches can be applied. For some reactions of the WCCR10 set, large deviations from density-functional results including semiclassical dispersion corrections from experimental reference data had been observed. We tackle the issue (i) by comparing to ab initio data that comprise dispersion effects on a rigorous first-principles footing and (ii) by a comparison of density-functional approaches that model dispersion interactions in various ways. Only for two reactions, species exhibiting nonnegligible static electron correlation were identified, and hence, we may choose standard single-reference coupled-cluster approaches to compare with density-functional methods for the other eight reactions. For WCCR10, the Minnesota M06-L functional yielded the smallest mean absolute deviation without additional dispersion corrections in comparison to the coupled-cluster results and the PBE0-D3 functional produced the overall smallest mean absolute deviation. The agreement of density-functional results with coupled-cluster data increases significantly upon inclusion of any type of dispersion correction. It is important to emphasize that different density-functional schemes available for this purpose perform equally well. The coupled-cluster dissociation energies, however, deviate significantly from experimental results.
38 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables
References in corpus (16)
- The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states
- Nonlocal van der Waals density functional: The simpler the better
- The density matrix renormalization group for ab initio quantum chemistry
- New Benchmark Set of Transition-Metal Coordination Reactions for the Assessment of Density Functionals
- Multi-reference perturbation theory with Cholesky decomposition for the density matrix renormalization group
- The Delicate Balance of Static and Dynamic Electron Correlation
- A flexible multi-reference perturbation theory by minimizing the Hylleraas functional with matrix product states
- Spin-adapted Matrix Product States and Operators
- Towards quantifying the role of exact exchange in predictions of transition metal complex properties
- Matrix Product State applications for the ALPS project
- Automated Identification of Relevant Frontier Orbitals for Chemical Compounds and Processes
- Systematic Error Estimation for Chemical Reaction Energies
- Measuring Multi-Configurational Character by Orbital Entanglement
- Error Assessment of Computational Models in Chemistry
- Steering Orbital Optimization out of Local Minima and Saddle Points Toward Lower Energy
- Statistical Analysis of Semiclassical Dispersion Corrections
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Quantum computing enhanced computational catalysis
- The Exploration of Chemical Reaction Networks
- Error-Controlled Exploration of Chemical Reaction Networks with Gaussian Processes
- Semiempirical Molecular Orbital Models based on the Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap Approximation
- Gaussian Process-Based Refinement of Dispersion Corrections
- Improved accuracy and transferability of molecular-orbital-based machine learning: Organics, transition-metal complexes, non-covalent interactions, and transition states
- Predicting Ligand-Dissociation Energies of 3d Coordination Complexes with Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo
- Molecule-specific Uncertainty Quantification in Quantum Chemical Studies
- The Transferability Limits of Static Benchmarks