A Quadruply Lensed SN Ia: Gaining a Time-Delay...Losing a Standard Candle
arXiv:1711.07919
Abstract
We investigate the flux ratio anomalies between macro-model predictions and the observed brightness of the supernova iPTF16geu, as published in a recent paper by More et al., 2017. This group suggested that these discrepancies are, qualitatively, likely due to microlensing. We analyze the plausibility of attributing this discrepancy to microlensing, and find that the discrepancy is too large to be due to microlensing alone. This is true whether one assumes knowledge of the luminosity of the supernova or allows the luminosity to be a free parameter. Varying the dark/stellar ratio likewise doesn't help. In addition, other macro-models with quadruplicity from external shear or ellipticity do not significantly improve to model. Finally, microlensing also makes it difficult to accurately determine the standard candle brightness of the supernova, as the likelihood plot for the intrinsic magnitude of the source (for a perfect macro-model) has a full width half maximum of 0.73 magnitudes. As such, the error for the standard candle brightness is quite large. This reduces the utility of the standard candle nature of type Ia supernovae.
arXiv commentSubmitted to MIT Journal of Undergraduate Research. 7 pages, 5 figures
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Strong gravitational lensing of explosive transients
- Rates and Properties of Strongly Gravitationally Lensed Supernovae and their Host Galaxies in Time-Domain Imaging Surveys
- The Impact of Microlensing on the Standardisation of Strongly Lensed Type Ia Supernovae
- Magnified or multiply imaged? - Search strategies for gravitationally lensed supernovae in wide-field surveys
- Two-component mass models of the lensing galaxy in the quadruply imaged supernova iPTF16geu
- Direct test of the FLRW metric from strongly lensed gravitational wave observations