The influence of the choice of post-processing method on Bell inequalities
arXiv:1710.07082 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.97.062123
Abstract
In every experimental test of a Bell inequality, we are faced with the problem of inefficient detectors. How we treat the events when no particle was detected has a big influence on the properties of the inequality. In this work, we study this influence. We show that the choice of post-processing can change the critical detection efficiency, the equivalence between different inequalities or the applicability of the non-signaling principle. We also consider the problem of choosing the optimal post-processing strategy. We show that this is a non-trivial problem and that different strategies are optimal for different ranges of detector efficiencies.
References in corpus (9)
- Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
- Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons
- Loopholes in Bell Inequality Tests of Local Realism
- Robust Self Testing of the Singlet
- Detection loophole in asymmetric Bell experiments
- Partial list of bipartite Bell inequalities with four binary settings
- Detection Loophole in Bell experiments: How post-selected local correlations can look non-local
- Locality, detection efficiencies, and probability polytopes
- On the equivalence of Clauser-Horne and Eberhard inequality based tests
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Exponentially decreasing critical detection efficiency for any Bell inequality
- The future of secure communications: device independence in quantum key distribution
- Bounding conditional entropy of bipartite states with Bell operators
- Quantum Assemblage Tomography
- Entanglement witnessing with untrusted detectors