paper

Molecular transitions as probes of the physical conditions of extragalactic environments

arXiv:1708.09188 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628877

Abstract

Ab initio grids of time dependent chemical models, varying in gas density, temperature, cosmic ray ionization rate, and radiation field, are used as input to RADEX calculations. Tables of abundances, column densities, theoretical line intensities, and line ratios for some of the most used dense gas tracers are provided. The degree of correlation as well as degeneracy inherent in molecular ratios is discussed. Comparisons of the theoretical intensities with example observations are also provided. We find that, within the parameters space explored, chemical abundances can be constrained by a well defined set of gas density-gas temperature-cosmic ray ionization rate for the species we investigate here. However, line intensities, as well as, more importantly, line ratios, from different chemical models can be very similar leading to a clear degeneracy. We also find that the gas subjected to a galactic cosmic ray ionization rate will not necessarily have reached steady state by 1 Myr. The species most affected by time dependency effects are HCN and CS, both high density tracers. We use our method to fit an example set of data from two galaxies. We find that (i) molecular line ratios can be easily matched even with erroneous individual line intensities; (ii) no set of species can be matched by a one-component ISM; (iii) a species may be a good tracer of an energetic process but only under specific density and temperature conditions. We show that by taking into consideration the chemistry behind each species and the individual line intensities, many degeneracies that arise by just using molecular line ratios can be avoided. Finally we show that using a species or a ratio as a tracer of an individual energetic process (e.g. cosmic rays, UV) ought to be done with caution.

A&A in press (in press version will be different from this one as tables will be either in appendix or on the journal online site) This is revised version as figure was wrong

References in corpus (7)

Cited by in corpus (19)