Electron counting in solids: oxidation states, partial charges and ionicity

Abstract

In this short viewpoint, we discuss the assignment of ionic charges in solids. We argue that formal oxidation states serve a useful function, and that absolute values of partial charges should be interpreted and applied with caution; the charge assigned can never be definitive and depends on the type of property studied and the type of analysis performed. Careful analysis can be used to avoid unphysical conclusions such as a recent report on the Ti(III) nature of Ti in stoichiometric TiO${}_2$.

References in corpus (1)

• On the oxidation state of titanium in titanium dioxide

Cited by in corpus (9)

• Big-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning
• Extending Shannon's Ionic Radii Database Using Machine Learning
• Donor and Acceptor Characteristics of Native Point Defects in GaN
• The electronic band structure and optical properties of boron arsenide
• Robust Machine Learning Inference from X-ray Absorption Near Edge Spectra through Featurization
• Anionic nickel and nitrogen effects in the chiral antiferromagnetic antiperovskite Mn${}_3$NiN
• Topological descriptors for the electron density of inorganic solids
• First-principles based Monte Carlo modeling of oxygen deficient Fe-substituted SrTiO${}_3$ experimental magnetization
• The Efficacy of Fiction or More on the Charge State of Ti in TiO2 and Formal Oxidation States