Field reparametrization in effective field theories

Abstract

Debate topic for Effective Field Theory (EFT) is the choice of a "basis" for $\mrdim = 6$ operators Clearly all bases are equivalent as long as they are a "basis", containing a minimal set of operators after the use of equations of motion and respecting gauge invariance. From a more formal point of view a basis is characterized by its closure with respect to renormalization. Equivalence of bases should always be understood as a statement for the S-matrix and not for the Lagrangian, as dictated by the equivalence theorem. Any phenomenological approach that misses one of these ingredients is still acceptable for a preliminar analysis, as long as it does not pretend to be an EFT. Here we revisit the equivalence theorem and its consequences for EFT when two sets of higher dimensional operators are connected by a set of non-linear, noninvariant, field reparametrizations.

arXiv comment15 pages, 11 figures

References in corpus (11)

• Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian
• Comment on Higgs Inflation and Naturalness
• Reduced Effective Lagrangians
• The Bases of Effective Field Theories
• Electroweak effective lagrangians
• NLO Higgs Effective Field Theory and kappa-framework
• NLO Inspired Effective Lagrangians for Higgs Physics
• Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model Part I: Prolegomena
• Reparameterization Invariance Revisited
• The Standard Model Effective Field Theory and Next to Leading Order
• Diffeomorphisms of quantum fields

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Covariant singularities in Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Gravity
• XEFT, the challenging path up the hill: dim = 6 and dim = 8