Individual wealth-based selection supports cooperation in spatial public goods games
arXiv:1610.01415
Abstract
In a social dilemma game group members are allowed to decide if they contribute to the joint venture or not. As a consequence, defectors, who do not invest but only enjoy the mutual benefit, prevail and the system evolves onto the tragedy of the common state. This unfortunate scenario can be avoided if participation is not obligatory but only happens with a given probability. But what if we also consider a player's individual wealth when to decide about participation? To address this issue we propose a model in which the probabilistic participation in the public goods game is combined with a conditional investment mode that is based on individual wealth: if a player's wealth exceeds a threshold value then it is qualified and can participate in the joint venture. Otherwise, the participation is forbidden in the investment interactions. We show that if only probabilistic participation is considered, spatially structured populations cannot support cooperation better than well-mixed populations where full defection state can also be avoided for small participation probabilities. By adding the wealth-based criterion of participation, however, structured populations are capable to augment network reciprocity relevantly and allow cooperator strategy to dominate in a broader parameter interval.
arXiv comment19 pages; 5 figures
References in corpus (11)
- Coevolutionary games - a mini review
- Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game
- The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions
- Topology independent impact of noise on cooperation in spatial public goods games
- Critical Coarsening without Surface Tension: the Voter Universality Class
- Coevolution of teaching activity promotes cooperation
- Making new connections towards cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game
- Does strong heterogeneity promote cooperation by group interactions?
- Coevolutionary success-driven multigames
- Success-driven distribution of public goods promotes cooperation but preserves defection
- The coevolution of overconfidence and bluffing in the resource competition game