Frequentist model comparison tests of sinusoidal variations in measurements of Newton's gravitational constant

Abstract

Anderson et al have claimed to find evidence for periodic sinusoidal variations (period=5.9 years) in measurements of Newton's Gravitational constant. These claims have been disputed by Pitkin. Using Bayesian model comparison, he argues that a model with an unknown Gaussian noise component is favored over any periodic variations by more than $e^{30}$. We re-examine the claims of Anderson et al using frequentist model comparison tests, both with and without errors in the measurement times. Our findings lend support to Pitkin's claim that a constant term along with an unknown systematic offset provides a better fit to the measurements of Newton's constant, compared to any sinusoidal variations.

4 pages, 1 figure

References in corpus (5)

• Introduction to astroML: Machine Learning for Astrophysics
• A Survey of Galaxy Kinematics to z ~ 1 in the TKRS/GOODS-N Field. II. Evolution in the Tully-Fisher Relation
• Measurements of Newton's gravitational constant and the length of day
• Recent measurements of the gravitational constant as a function of time
• Robust model comparison disfavors power law cosmology

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Classification of Gamma-Ray Burst durations using robust model-comparison techniques
• Median statistics estimates of Hubble and Newton's Constant
• Statistical Significance of spectral lag transition in GRB 160625B
• Search for Lorentz Invariance Violation from stacked Gamma-Ray Burst spectral lag data
• Astrophysical and Cosmological Searches for Lorentz Invariance Violation
• Search for variability in Newton's constant using local gravitational acceleration measurements