Optimal error intervals for properties of the quantum state
arXiv:1602.05780 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.062112
Abstract
Quantum state estimation aims at determining the quantum state from observed data. Estimating the full state can require considerable efforts, but one is often only interested in a few properties of the state, such as the fidelity with a target state, or the degree of correlation for a specified bipartite structure. Rather than first estimating the state, one can, and should, estimate those quantities of interest directly from the data. We propose the use of optimal error intervals as a meaningful way of stating the accuracy of the estimated property values. Optimal error intervals are analogs of the optimal error regions for state estimation [New J. Phys. 15, 123026 (2013)]. They are optimal in two ways: They have the largest likelihood for the observed data and the pre-chosen size, and are the smallest for the pre-chosen probability of containing the true value. As in the state situation, such optimal error intervals admit a simple description in terms of the marginal likelihood for the data for the properties of interest. Here, we present the concept and construction of optimal error intervals, report on an iterative algorithm for reliable computation of the marginal likelihood (a quantity difficult to calculate reliably), explain how plausible intervals --- a notion of evidence provided by the data --- are related to our optimal error intervals, and illustrate our methods with single-qubit and two-qubit examples.
Very close to the published version; 22 pages, 10 figures, and 40 references
References in corpus (10)
- Experimental Quantum State Tomography of Optical Fields and Ultrafast Statistical Sampling
- Direct Fidelity Estimation from Few Pauli Measurements
- Toolbox for entanglement detection and fidelity estimation
- Practical, Reliable Error Bars in Quantum Tomography
- Entanglement verification with finite data
- Monte Carlo sampling from the quantum state space. II
- Monte Carlo sampling from the quantum state space. I
- Lower bounds for the fidelity of entangled state preparation
- Quantum state tomography: Mean squared error matters, bias does not
- Least-bias state estimation with incomplete unbiased measurements
Cited by in corpus (17)
- Very strong evidence in favor of quantum mechanics and against local hidden variables from a Bayesian analysis
- A comparative study of estimation methods in quantum tomography
- Numerical study of Wigner negativity in one-dimensional steady-state resonance fluorescence
- Error regions in quantum state tomography: computational complexity caused by geometry of quantum states
- Experimental comparison of tomography and self-testing in certifying entanglement
- Practical and reliable error bars for quantum process tomography
- Using prior expansions for prior-data conflict checking
- Proper error bars for self-calibrating quantum tomography
- Estimation of entanglement in bipartite systems directly from tomograms
- Efficient Bayesian credible-region certification for quantum-state tomography
- Bayesian error regions in quantum estimation I: analytical reasonings
- Probing Bayesian credible regions intrinsically: a feasible error certification for physical systems
- Evidence-based certification of quantum dimensions
- User-specified random sampling of quantum channels and its applications
- Signatures of nonclassical effects in tomograms
- Relative-belief inference in quantum information theory
- Tomographic entanglement indicators from NMR experiments