Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models do not require zero active mass
arXiv:1601.07890 · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw079
Abstract
The cosmological model has received considerable attention in recent years owing to claims that it is favoured over the standard cold dark matter (CDM) model by most observational data. A key feature of the model is that the zero active mass condition holds at all epochs. Most recently, Melia has claimed that this condition is a requirement of the symmetries of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) spacetime. We demonstrate that this claim is false and results from a flaw in the logic of Melia's argument.
4 pages, accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (6)
- We do not live in the R_h = c t universe
- Robust model comparison disfavors power law cosmology
- Physical Basis for the Symmetries in the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Metric
- The Zero Active Mass Condition in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Cosmologies
- A Comparison of Cosmological Models Using Time Delay Lenses
- Constraints on Dark Energy from the Observed Expansion of our Cosmic Horizon
Cited by in corpus (9)
- The Zero Active Mass Condition in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Cosmologies
- Model Comparison of CDM vs using Cosmic Chronometers
- Power law cosmology model comparison with CMB scale information
- Testing the Distance-Duality Relation in the Universe
- Alternative ideas in cosmology
- Primordial Nucleosynthesis in the Rh = ct cosmology: Pouring cold water on the Simmering Universe
- A Distance-Deviation Consistency and Model-Independent Method to Test the Cosmic Distance-Duality Relation
- Puzzling initial conditions in the R_h=ct model
- Is there a Cosmological Basis for E = mc^2?