Constraints on Dark Energy from the Observed Expansion of our Cosmic Horizon

Abstract

Within the context of standard cosmology, an accelerating universe requires the presence of a third `dark' component of energy, beyond matter and radiation. The available data, however, are still deemed insufficient to distinguish between an evolving dark energy component and the simplest model of a time-independent cosmological constant. In this paper, we examine the cosmological expansion in terms of observer-dependent coordinates, in addition to the more conventional co-moving coordinates. This procedure explicitly reveals the role played by the radius R_h of our cosmic horizon in the interrogation of the data. (In Rindler's notation, R_h coincides with the `event horizon' in the case of de Sitter, but changes in time for other cosmologies that also contain matter and/or radiation.) With this approach, we show that the interpretation of dark energy as a cosmological constant is clearly disfavored by the observations. Within the framework of standard Friedman-Robertson-Walker cosmology, we derive an equation describing the evolution of R_h, and solve it using the WMAP and Type Ia supernova data. In particular, we consider the meaning of the observed equality (or near equality) R_h(t_0) ~ ct_0, where t_0 is the age of the Universe. This empirical result is far from trivial, for a cosmological constant would drive R_h(t) towards ct (where t is the cosmic time) only once--and that would have to occur right now. Though we are not here espousing any particular alternative model of dark energy, for comparison we also consider scenarios in which dark energy is given by scaling solutions, which simultaneously eliminate several conundrums in the standard model, including the `coincidence' and `flatness' problems, and account very well for the fact that R_h(t_0) ~ ct_0.

arXiv commentAccepted for publication in the Int. Journal of Modern Physics D

References in corpus (32)

• Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
• Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
• First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters
• Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at z>1 From the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for Past Deceleration and Constraints on Dark Energy Evolution
• Where are the missing galactic satellites?
• Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry
• Is Cosmic Speed-Up Due to New Gravitational Physics?
• Modified gravity with negative and positive powers of the curvature: unification of the inflation and of the cosmic acceleration
• Chameleon Fields: Awaiting Surprises for Tests of Gravity in Space
• Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions
• Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than -1?
• A Survey of z>5.7 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey II: Discovery of Three Additional Quasars at z>6
• A classification of scalar field potentials with cosmological scaling solutions
• Curvature quintessence matched with observational data
• The HST Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale. XXVIII. Combining the Constraints on the Hubble Constant
• Detecting Dark Energy in Orbit -- the Cosmological Chameleon
• Cosmological scaling solutions of non-minimally coupled scalar fields
• Cardassian Expansion: a Model in which the Universe is Flat, Matter Dominated, and Accelerating
• The State of the Dark Energy Equation of State
• The foundations of observing dark energy dynamics with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe
• Applications of scalar attractor solutions to Cosmology
• Spintessence! New Models for Dark Matter and Dark Energy
• The Cosmic Horizon
• Local and Global Variations of The Fine Structure Constant
• General Scalar Fields as Quintessence
• Scaling Solutions and reconstruction of Scalar Field Potentials
• Scaling Solutions in Robertson-Walker Spacetimes
• Observational constraints on cosmology from modified Friedmann equation
• On the potentials yielding cosmological scaling solutions
• Brane Quintessence
• What Can Gamma Ray Bursts Teach Us About Dark Energy?
• Weak Lensing from Space I: Instrumentation and Survey Strategy

Cited by in corpus (11)

• The R_h = ct Universe
• Photon Geodesics in FRW Cosmologies
• Matter Matters: Unphysical Properties of the Rh = ct Universe
• Through the Looking Glass: Why the "Cosmic Horizon" is not a horizon
• How does the Hubble Sphere limit our view of the Universe?
• The Gravitational Horizon for a Universe with Phantom Energy
• Reconciling the cosmic age problem in the R_h=ct Universe
• Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models do not require zero active mass
• The $R_{\mathrm{h}}=ct$ universe and quintessence
• Phantom Energy and the Cosmic Horizon: Rh is still not a horizon!
• Puzzling initial conditions in the R_h=ct model