Causal interpretation rules for encoding and decoding models in neuroimaging
arXiv:1511.04780 · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.036
Abstract
Causal terminology is often introduced in the interpretation of encoding and decoding models trained on neuroimaging data. In this article, we investigate which causal statements are warranted and which ones are not supported by empirical evidence. We argue that the distinction between encoding and decoding models is not sufficient for this purpose: relevant features in encoding and decoding models carry a different meaning in stimulus- and in response-based experimental paradigms. We show that only encoding models in the stimulus-based setting support unambiguous causal interpretations. By combining encoding and decoding models trained on the same data, however, we obtain insights into causal relations beyond those that are implied by each individual model type. We illustrate the empirical relevance of our theoretical findings on EEG data recorded during a visuo-motor learning task.
arXiv commentaccepted manuscript
References in corpus (5)
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Causality in cognitive neuroscience: concepts, challenges, and distributional robustness
- Personalized Brain-Computer Interface Models for Motor Rehabilitation
- Same Cause; Different Effects in the Brain
- Recovery of non-linear cause-effect relationships from linearly mixed neuroimaging data
- MERLiN: Mixture Effect Recovery in Linear Networks
- Interpreting Encoding and Decoding Models
- False Discovery Proportion control for aggregated Knockoffs
- The right tool for the right question --- beyond the encoding versus decoding dichotomy
- ECKO: Ensemble of Clustered Knockoffs for multivariate inference on fMRI data
- Exploration, inference and prediction in neuroscience and biomedicine