Random walk hierarchy measure: What is more hierarchical, a chain, a tree or a star?
arXiv:1508.07732 · doi:10.1038/srep17994
Abstract
Signs of hierarchy are prevalent in a wide range of systems in nature and society. One of the key problems is quantifying the importance of hierarchical organisation in the structure of the network representing the interactions or connections between the fundamental units of the studied system. Although a number of notable methods are already available, their vast majority is treating all directed acyclic graphs as already maximally hierarchical. Here we propose a hierarchy measure based on random walks on the network. The novelty of our approach is that directed trees corresponding to multi level pyramidal structures obtain higher hierarchy scores compared to directed chains and directed stars. Furthermore, in the thermodynamic limit the hierarchy measure of regular trees is converging to a well defined limit depending only on the branching number. When applied to real networks, our method is computationally very effective, as the result can be evaluated with arbitrary precision by subsequent multiplications of the transition matrix describing the random walk process. In addition, the tests on real world networks provided very intuitive results, e.g., the trophic levels obtained from our approach on a food web were highly consistent with former results from ecology.
References in corpus (5)
Cited by in corpus (6)
- The evolutionary origins of hierarchy
- Element-centric clustering comparison unifies overlaps and hierarchy
- Interplay Between Hierarchy and Centrality in Complex Networks
- Time evolution of the hierarchical networks between PubMed MeSH terms
- Comparing the hierarchy of keywords in on-line news portals
- Emergence of leader-follower hierarchy among players in an on-line experiment