Weak values are quantum: you can bet on it
arXiv:1508.06304 · doi:10.1007/s40509-015-0069-z
Abstract
The outcome of a weak quantum measurement conditioned to a subsequent postselection (a weak value protocol) can assume peculiar values. These results cannot be explained in terms of conditional probabilistic outcomes of projective measurements. However, a classical model has been recently put forward that can reproduce peculiar expectation values, reminiscent of weak values. This led the authors of that work to claim that weak values have an entirely classical explanation. Here we discuss what is quantum about weak values with the help of a simple model based on basic quantum mechanics. We first demonstrate how a classical theory can indeed give rise to non-trivial conditional values, and explain what features of weak values are genuinely quantum. We finally use our model to outline some main issues under current research.
6 pages, 1 figure
References in corpus (5)
- Anomalous Weak Values Are Proofs of Contextuality
- How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads
- Weak Values are Interference Phenomena
- Disturbance in weak measurements and the difference between quantum and classical weak values
- Why the "classical" explanation of weak values by Ferrie and Combes does not work: a comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 120404 (2014)
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Weak value controversy
- Determination of weak values of quantum operators using only strong measurements
- Interference experiment, anomalous weak value and Leggett-Garg test of macrorealism
- Weak Measurement and Two-State-Vector Formalism: Deficit of Momentum Transfer in Scattering Processes
- Amplification of Gravitationally Induced Entanglement
- Weak values from path integrals