Could quantum mechanics describe completely and consistently all superconducting and other quantum phenomena?
arXiv:1508.03505
Abstract
Canonical description of quantization effects observed at measurements on superconducting structures seems one of the most triumphant achievements of quantum mechanics. But impartial consideration uncovers incompleteness and inconsistency of this description. Contradictions in the description of other quantum phenomena are revealed also.
9 pages, 1 figure
References in corpus (11)
- The Free Will Theorem
- Persistent currents in normal metal rings
- Fluctuation Superconductivity in Mesoscopic Aluminum Rings
- The Meissner effect puzzle and the quantum force in superconductor
- A possibility of persistent voltage observation in a system of asymmetric superconducting rings
- Comment on "Vortices induced in a superconducting loop by asymmetric kinetic inductance and their detection in transport measurements"
- Bohm's quantum potential and quantum force in superconductor
- Single-Shot Readout of Macroscopic Quantum Superposition State in a Superconducting Flux Qubit
- Aharonov-Bohm effects in nanostructures
- The quantum mechanics is a non-universal theory. The realistic Schrodinger's and positivistic Born's interpretation of the wave function
- Experimental investigations of the change with magnetic flux of quantum number in superconducting ring