Combining spectroscopic and photometric surveys using angular cross-correlations III: Galaxy bias and stochastisity
arXiv:1508.00035 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2168
Abstract
In the first paper of this series, we studied the effect of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), redshift space distortions (RSD) and weak lensing (WL) on measurements of angular cross-correlations in narrow redshift bins. Paper-II presented a multitracer forecast as Figures of Merit (FoM), combining a photometric and spectroscopic stage-IV survey. The uncertainties from galaxy bias, the way light traces mass, is an important ingredient in the forecast. Fixing the bias would increase our FoM equivalent to 3.3 times larger area for the combined constraints. This paper focus on how the modelling of bias affect these results. In the combined forecast, lensing both help and benefit from the improved bias measurements in overlapping surveys after marginalizing over the cosmological parameters. Adding a second lens population in counts-shear does not have a large impact on bias error, but removing all counts-shear information increases the bias error in a significant way. We also discuss the relative impact of WL, magnification, RSD and BAO, and how results change as a function of bias amplitude, photo-z error and sample density. By default we use one bias parameter per bin (with 72 narrow bins), but we show that the results do not change much when we use other parameterizations, with at least 3 parameters in total. Bias stochasticity, even when added as one new free parameter per bin, only produce moderate decrease in the FoM. In general, we find that the degradation in the figure of merit caused by the uncertainties in the knowledge of bias is significantly smaller for overlapping surveys.
References in corpus (11)
- The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Data Release 10 and 11 galaxy samples
- On the Robustness of the Acoustic Scale in the Low-Redshift Clustering of Matter
- Cosmology and the Bispectrum
- Galaxy alignments: Observations and impact on cosmology
- Precise photometric redshifts with a narrow-band filter set: The PAU Survey at the William Herschel Telescope
- The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: measuring the cosmic growth rate with the two-point galaxy correlation function
- A Prescription for Galaxy Biasing Evolution as a Nuisance Parameter
- Non-local bias contribution to third-order galaxy correlations
- Combining spectroscopic and photometric surveys using angular cross-correlations II: Parameter constraints from different physical effects
- Combining spectroscopic and photometric surveys using angular cross-correlations I: Algorithm and modelling
- Cosmological constraints from multiple tracers in spectroscopic surveys
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Euclid preparation: XIX. Impact of magnification on photometric galaxy clustering
- Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
- The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Angular clustering tomography and its cosmological implications
- Galaxy bias from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data: combining galaxy density maps and weak lensing maps
- Validating Synthetic Galaxy Catalogs for Dark Energy Science in the LSST Era
- Cosmological constraints from multiple tracers in spectroscopic surveys
- Starlet higher order statistics for galaxy clustering and weak lensing
- Blending and obscuration in weak lensing magnification