Amplifying the Impact of Open Access: Wikipedia and the Diffusion of Science
arXiv:1506.07608 · doi:10.1002/asi.23687
Abstract
With the rise of Wikipedia as a first-stop source for scientific knowledge, it is important to compare its representation of that knowledge to that of the academic literature. Here we identify the 250 most heavily used journals in each of 26 research fields (4,721 journals, 19.4M articles in total) indexed by the Scopus database, and test whether topic, academic status, and accessibility make articles from these journals more or less likely to be referenced on Wikipedia. We find that a journal's academic status (impact factor) and accessibility (open access policy) both strongly increase the probability of it being referenced on Wikipedia. Controlling for field and impact factor, the odds that an open access journal is referenced on the English Wikipedia are 47% higher compared to paywall journals. One of the implications of this study is that a major consequence of open access policies is to significantly amplify the diffusion of science, through an intermediary like Wikipedia, to a broad audience.
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Wikipedia Workshop at 9th International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), Oxford, UK, Forthcoming in: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- How Frequently are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited
- Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks
- Open Access Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences: an Open Access Altmetric Advantage
- Using Deep Learning for Title-Based Semantic Subject Indexing to Reach Competitive Performance to Full-Text
- Open Access Improves the Dissemination of Science: Insights from Wikipedia
- Mapping the backbone of the Humanities through the eyes of Wikipedia
- Longitudinal Assessment of Reference Quality on Wikipedia