3 papers
cs.CY2021
Does double-blind peer-review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference
Mengyi Sun, Jainabou Barry Danfa, Misha Teplitskiy
Peer review is widely regarded as essential for advancing scientific research. However, reviewers may be biased by authors' prestige or other characteristics. Double-blind peer rev…
cs.SI2020
Status drives how we cite: Evidence from thousands of authors
Misha Teplitskiy, Eamon Duede, Michael Menietti +1
Researchers cite works for a variety of reasons, including some having nothing to do with acknowledging influence. The distribution of different citation types in the literature, a…
cs.DL2018
The Social Structure of Consensus in Scientific Review
Misha Teplitskiy, Daniel Acuna, Aida Elamrani-Raoult +2
Personal connections between creators and evaluators of scientific works are ubiquitous, and the possibility of bias ever-present. Although connections have been shown to bias pros…