A counterexample to the Hopf-Oleinik lemma (elliptic case)
arXiv:1503.02179 · doi:10.2140/apde.2016.9.439
Abstract
We construct a new counterexample confirming the sharpness of the Dini-type condition for the boundary of . In particular, we show that for convex domains the Dini-type assumption is the necessary and sufficient condition which guarantees the Hopf-Oleinik type estimates.
26 pages, 1 figure
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Boundary Lipschitz Regularity and the Hopf Lemma for Fully Nonlinear Elliptic Equations
- Global integrability and boundary estimates for uniformly elliptic PDE in divergence form
- Schauder type estimates for degenerate or singular elliptic equations with DMO coefficients
- Higher order boundary Harnack principles in Dini type domains
- A note on boundary point principles for partial differential inequalities of elliptic type
- Quantitative uniqueness of continuation result related to Hopf's lemma
- Mixed Boundary Value Problems for non-Divergence Type Elliptic Equations in Unbounded Domain
- A note on boundary differentiability of solutions of nondivergece elliptic equations with unbounded drift