SARCS strong-lensing galaxy groups: II - mass-concentration relation and strong-lensing bias
arXiv:1409.5905 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424706
Abstract
Our work is based on the stacked weak-lensing analysis of a sample of 80 strong-lensing galaxy groups. Our main results are the following: (i) the lensing signal does not allow us to firmly reject a simple singular isothermal sphere mass distribution compared to the expected NFW mass profile; (ii) we obtain an average concentration that is much higher than the expected value from numerical simulations for the corresponding average mass ; (iii) the combination of our results with those at larger mass scales gives a mass-concentration relation over nearly two decades in mass, with a slope in disagreement with predictions from numerical simulations using unbiased populations of dark matter haloes; (iv) our combined relation matches results from simulations using only haloes with a large strong-lensing cross section, i.e. elongated with a major axis close to the line of sight; (v) for the simplest case of prolate haloes, we estimate with a toy model a lower limit on the minor:major axis ratio for the average SARCS galaxy group. Our analysis based on galaxy groups confirmed the results obtained at larger mass scales: strong lenses present apparently too large concentrations, which can be explained by triaxial haloes preferentially oriented with the line of sight. Because more massive systems already have large lensing cross sections, they do not require a large elongation along the line of sight, contrary to less massive galaxy groups. Therefore, it is natural to observe larger lensing (projected) concentrations for such systems, resulting in an overall mass-concentration relation steeper than that of non-lensing haloes.
References in corpus (32)
- Concentration, Spin and Shape of Dark Matter Haloes as a Function of the Cosmological Model: WMAP1, WMAP3 and WMAP5 results
- A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters
- The redshift dependence of the structure of massive LCDM halos
- Virial Scaling of Massive Dark Matter Halos: Why Clusters Prefer a High Normalization Cosmology
- Revealing the properties of dark matter in the merging cluster MACSJ0025.4-1222
- CLASH: Weak-Lensing Shear-and-Magnification Analysis of 20 Galaxy Clusters
- CIRS: Cluster Infall Regions in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey I. Infall Patterns and Mass Profiles
- Density profiles of galaxy groups and clusters from SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
- The CFHTLS Strong Lensing Legacy Survey: I. Survey overview and T0002 release sample
- Probing the Dark Matter and Gas Fraction in Relaxed Galaxy Groups with X-ray observations from Chandra and XMM
- The dark matter halos of massive, relaxed galaxy clusters observed with Chandra
- The Observed Concentration-Mass Relation for Galaxy Clusters
- The X-Ray Concentration-Virial Mass Relation
- Precision photometric redshift calibration for galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
- Parametric Strong Gravitational Lensing Analysis of Abell 1689
- Galaxies in X-ray Groups. II. A Weak Lensing Study of Halo Centering
- Combining Lens Distortion and Depletion to Map the Mass Distribution of A1689
- The SL2S Galaxy-scale Lens Sample. II. Cosmic evolution of dark and luminous mass in early-type galaxies
- A Statistical Study of Weak Lensing by Triaxial Dark Matter Halos: Consequences for Parameter Estimation
- Strong Lensing in Abell 1703: Constraints on the Slope of the Inner Dark Matter Distribution
- A New Look at Massive Clusters: weak lensing constraints on the triaxial dark matter halos of Abell 1689, Abell 1835, & Abell 2204
- X-ray properties in massive galaxy clusters: XMM-Newton observations of the REFLEX-DXL sample
- Galaxy cluster mass profiles
- Large Einstein Radii: A Problem for LambdaCDM
- The strongest gravitational lenses: I. The statistical impact of cluster mergers
- Full Lensing Analysis of Abell 1703: Comparison of Independent Lens-Modelling Techniques
- An MCMC Fitting Method for Triaxial Dark Matter Haloes
- Dark matter-baryons separation at the lowest mass scale: the Bullet Group
- The strongest gravitational lenses: II. Is the large Einstein radius of MACS J0717.5+3745 in conflict with LCDM?
- Characterizing SL2S galaxy groups using the Einstein radius
- The abundance of Bullet-groups in LCDM
- The strongest gravitational lenses: III. The order statistics of the largest Einstein radii