Global temperatures and sunspot numbers. Are they related? Yes, but non linearly. A reply to Gil-Alana et al. (2014)
arXiv:1407.7794 · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.047
Abstract
Gil-Alana et al. (Physica A: 396, 42-50, 2014) compared the sunspot number record and the temperature record and found that they differ: the sunspot number record is characterized by a dominant 11-year cycle while the temperature record appears to be characterized by a singularity or pole in the spectral density function at the zero frequency. Consequently, they claimed that the two records are characterized by substantially different statistical fractional models and rejected the hypothesis that sun influences significantly global temperatures. I show that: (1) the "singularity" or "pole" in the spectral density function of the global surface temperature at the "zero" frequency does not exist - it is a typical misinterpretation that discrete power spectra of non-stationary signals can suggest; (2) appropriate continuous periodograms clarify the issue and also show a signature of the 11-year solar cycle (amplitude <0.1 K), which since 1850 has an average period of about 10.4 year, and of many other natural oscillations; (3) the solar signature in the surface temperature record can be recognized only using specific techniques of analysis that take into account non-linearity and filtering of the multiple climate change contributions; (4) the post 1880-year temperature warming trend cannot be compared or studied against the sunspot record and its 11-year cycle, but requires solar proxy models showing short and long scale oscillations plus the contribution of anthropogenic forcings, as done in the literature. Multiple evidences suggest that global temperatures and sunspot numbers are quite related to each other at multiple time scales through complex and non-linear processes. Finally, I show that the prediction of a semi-empirical model for the global temperature based on astronomical oscillations and anthropogenic forcing proposed by Scafetta since 2009 has up to date been successful.
arXiv comment21 pages, 6 figures
References in corpus (15)
- A new approach to long-term reconstruction of the solar irradiance leads to large historical solar forcing
- Cosmic Rays and Climate
- Empirical evidence for a celestial origin of the climate oscillations and its implications
- Multi-scale harmonic model for solar and climate cyclical variation throughout the Holocene based on Jupiter-Saturn tidal frequencies plus the 11-year solar dynamo cycle
- Estimate solar contribution to the global surface warming using the ACRIM TSI satellite composite
- Discussion on climate oscillations: CMIP5 general circulation models versus a semi empirical harmonic model based on astronomical cycles
- Empirical analysis of the solar contribution to global mean air surface temperature change
- Solar Flare Intermittency and the Earth's Temperature Anomalies
- Testing an astronomically-based decadal-scale empirical harmonic climate model versus the IPCC (2007) general circulation climate models
- ACRIM total solar irradiance satellite composite validation versus TSI proxy models
- Climate Change Attribution Using Empirical Decomposition of Climatic Data
- The complex planetary synchronization structure of the solar system
- Solar and planetary oscillation control on climate change: hind-cast, forecast and a comparison with the CMIP5 GCMs
- Discussion on common errors in analyzing sea level accelerations, solar trends and global warming
- On the alleged coherence between the global temperature and the sun's movement