Group Minds and the Case of Wikipedia
arXiv:1407.2210 · doi:10.15346/hc.v1i1.2
Abstract
Group-level cognitive states are widely observed in human social systems, but their discussion is often ruled out a priori in quantitative approaches. In this paper, we show how reference to the irreducible mental states and psychological dynamics of a group is necessary to make sense of large scale social phenomena. We introduce the problem of mental boundaries by reference to a classic problem in the evolution of cooperation. We then provide an explicit quantitative example drawn from ongoing work on cooperation and conflict among Wikipedia editors, showing how some, but not all, effects of individual experience persist in the aggregate. We show the limitations of methodological individualism, and the substantial benefits that come from being able to refer to collective intentions, and attributions of cognitive states of the form "what the group believes" and "what the group values".
arXiv comment21 pages, 6 figures; matches published version
References in corpus (7)
- What Is a Macrostate? Subjective Observations and Objective Dynamics
- Bootstrap Methods for the Empirical Study of Decision-Making and Information Flows in Social Systems
- Inductive Game Theory and the Dynamics of Animal Conflict
- Cyclic game dynamics driven by iterated reasoning
- Collective Phenomena and Non-Finite State Computation in a Human Social System
- Evidence of strategic periodicities in collective conflict dynamics
- Effective Theories for Circuits and Automata