paper

Central compact objects, superslow X-ray pulsars, gamma-ray bursts: do they have anything to do with magnetars?

arXiv:1406.6458

Abstract

Magnetars and many of the magnetar-related objects are summarized together and discussed. It is shown that there is an abuse of language in the use of "magnetar". Anomalous X-ray pulsars and soft gamma-ray repeaters are well-known magnetar candidates. The current so called anti-magnetar (for central compact objects), accreting magnetar (for superslow X-ray pulsars in high mass X-ray binaries), and millisecond magnetar (for the central engine of some gamma-ray bursts), they may not be real magnetars in present understandings. Their observational behaviors are not caused by the magnetic energy. Many of them are just neutron stars with strong surface dipole field. A neutron star plus strong dipole field is not a magnetar. The characteristic parameters of the neutron stars for the central engine of some gamma-ray bursts are atypical from the neutron stars in the Galaxy. Possible signature of magnetic activities in accreting systems are discussed, including repeated bursts and a hard X-ray tail. China's future hard X-ray modulation telescope may contribute to finding some magnetic activities in accreting neutron star systems.

arXiv comment10 pages, 2 figures. We feel that there is an abuse of language in the use of "magnetar". This paper tries to comment on this. It will not be submitted to any journal

References in corpus (3)

Cited by in corpus (4)