What is the distance to the CMB?
arXiv:1405.7860 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/11/036
Abstract
The success of precision cosmology depends not only on accurate observations, but also on the theoretical model - which must be understood to at least the same level of precision. Subtle relativistic effects can lead to biased measurements if they are neglected. One such effect gives a systematic shift in the distance-redshift relation away from its background value, due to the non- linear relativistic conservation of total photon flux. We also show directly how this shift follows from a fully relativistic analysis of the geodesic deviation equation. We derive the expectation value of the shift using second-order perturbations about a concordance background, and show that the distance to last scattering is increased by 1%. We argue that neglecting this shift could lead to a significant bias in the background cosmological parameters, because it alters the meaning of the background model. A naive adjustment of CMB parameter estimation if this shift is really a correction to the background would raise the H0 value inferred from the CMB by 5%, potentially removing the tension with local measurements of H0. Other CMB parameters which depend on the distance would also be shifted by ~1sigma when combined with local H0 data. While our estimations rely on a simplistic analysis, they nevertheless illustrate that accurately defining the background model in terms of the expectation values of observables is critical when we aim to determine the model parameters at the sub-percent level.
arXiv comment15 pages, 3 figures. v3 is the version to appear in JCAP
References in corpus (20)
- Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year Results: Implications for Cosmology
- Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
- Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
- The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes
- Baryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function
- Stable clustering, the halo model and nonlinear cosmological power spectra
- A 3% Solution: Determination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3
- Does the growth of structure affect our dynamical models of the universe? The averaging, backreaction and fitting problems in cosmology
- Dynamical Dark Energy or Simply Cosmic Curvature?
- Cosmic variance and the measurement of the local Hubble parameter
- (Mis-)Interpreting supernovae observations in a lumpy universe
- The Effect of Inhomogeneities on the Luminosity Distance-Redshift Relation: is Dark Energy Necessary in a Perturbed Universe?
- Evidence for a Lower Value for from Cosmic Chronometers Data?
- The value of H_0 in the inhomogeneous Universe
- Do stochastic inhomogeneities affect dark-energy precision measurements?
- Full-sky lensing shear at second order
- Average and dispersion of the luminosity-redshift relation in the concordance model
- An exact Jacobi map in the geodesic light-cone gauge
- Model-independent cosmological constraints from the CMB
- Is backreaction really small within concordance cosmology?
Cited by in corpus (28)
- From galactic bars to the Hubble tension: weighing up the astrophysical evidence for Milgromian gravity
- Determining with Bayesian hyper-parameters
- Bias and scatter in the Hubble diagram from cosmological large-scale structure
- On the Bias of the Distance-Redshift Relation from Gravitational Lensing
- CMB-lensing beyond the Born approximation
- How does the cosmic large-scale structure bias the Hubble diagram?
- The Cosmic Microwave Background: The history of its experimental investigation and its significance for cosmology
- Do we care about the distance to the CMB? Clarifying the impact of second-order lensing
- Observed galaxy number counts on the lightcone up to second order: III. Magnification Bias
- Cosmological ensemble and directional averages of observables
- Unified Treatment of the Luminosity Distance in Cosmology
- The theory of stochastic cosmological lensing
- The variance of the locally measured Hubble parameter explained with different estimators
- The Local Value of in an Inhomogeneous Universe
- Towards detection of relativistic effects in galaxy number counts using kSZ Tomography
- Born-corrections to weak lensing of the cosmic microwave background temperature and polarisation anisotropies
- Theoretical and numerical perspectives on cosmic distance averages
- CMB seen through random Swiss Cheese
- Hubble flow variations as a test for inhomogeneous cosmology
- Gravitational corrections to light propagation in a perturbed FLRW-universe and corresponding weak lensing spectra
- The art of building a smooth cosmic distance ladder in a perturbed universe
- Can the quasi-molecular mechanism of recombination decrease the Hubble tension?
- Emergence of smooth distance and apparent magnitude in a lumpy Universe
- Construction of the cosmological model with periodically distributed inhomogeneities with growing amplitude
- The Cosmological Consistency Relation in a Universe with Structure
- Angular diameter distances reconsidered in the Newman and Penrose formalism
- A Cosmological Bragg Law: Interpreting the CMB as a Diffractogram of Foliated Spacetime
- Les Houches on Dark Universe 2025: Elements of cosmology beyond FLRW