paper

A Comparison of X-ray and Optical Emission in Cassiopeia A

arXiv:1403.5812 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/138

Abstract

Broadband optical and narrowband Si XIII X-ray images of the young Galactic supernova remnant Cas A obtained over several decades are used to investigate spatial and temporal correlations on both large and small scales. The data consist of optical and near infrared ground-based and Hubble Space Telescope images taken between 1951 and 2011, and X-ray images from Einstein, ROSAT, and Chandra taken between 1979 and 2013. We find weak spatial correlations between the remnant's emission features on large scales, but several cases of good optical/X-ray correlations on small scales for features which have brightened due to recent interaction with the reverse shock. We also find instances where: (i) a time delay is observed between the appearance of a feature's optical and X-ray emissions, (ii) displacements of several arcseconds between a feature's X-ray and optical emission peaks and, (iii) regions showing no corresponding X-ray or optical emissions. To explain this behavior, we propose a inhomogeneous model for Cas A's ejecta consisting of small, dense optically emitting knots (n ~ 10^(2-3)/cm^(3)) and a much lower density (n ~ 0.1 - 1/cm^(3)) diffuse X-ray emitting component often spatially associated with optical emission knots. The X-ray emitting component is sometimes linked to optical clumps through shock induced mass ablation generating trailing material leading to spatially offset X-ray/optical emissions. A range of ejecta densities can also explain the observed X-ray/optical time delays since the remnant's 5000 km/s reverse shock heats dense ejecta clumps to temperatures around 3x10^4 K relatively quickly which then become optically bright while more diffuse ejecta become X-ray bright on longer timescales. Highly inhomogeneous ejecta as proposed here for Cas A may help explain some of the X-ray/opticalfeatures seen in other young core collapse SN remnants.

31 pages, 21 figures. Submitted to the Astrophysical Journal. Please contact the corresponding author for higher resolution postscript versions of the figures ([email protected])

References in corpus (8)

Cited by in corpus (18)