Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures III: approximate decompositions
arXiv:1401.4178
Abstract
In a sequence of four papers, we prove the following results (via a unified approach) for all sufficiently large : (i) [1-factorization conjecture] Suppose that is even and . Then every -regular graph on vertices has a decomposition into perfect matchings. Equivalently, . (ii) [Hamilton decomposition conjecture] Suppose that . Then every -regular graph on vertices has a decomposition into Hamilton cycles and at most one perfect matching. (iii) We prove an optimal result on the number of edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles in a graph of given minimum degree. According to Dirac, (i) was first raised in the 1950s. (ii) and (iii) answer questions of Nash-Williams from 1970. The above bounds are best possible. In the current paper, we show the following: suppose that is close to a complete balanced bipartite graph or to the union of two cliques of equal size. If we are given a suitable set of path systems which cover a set of `exceptional' vertices and edges of , then we can extend these path systems into an approximate decomposition of into Hamilton cycles (or perfect matchings if appropriate).
We originally split the proof into four papers, of which this was the third paper. We have now combined this series into a single publication [arXiv:1401.4159v2], which will appear in the Memoirs of the AMS. 29 pages, 2 figures
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Hamilton cycles in graphs and hypergraphs: an extremal perspective
- Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures II: the bipartite case
- Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures IV: exceptional systems for the two cliques case
- Packing, Counting and Covering Hamilton cycles in random directed graphs
- Vertex-transitive graphs that have no Hamilton decomposition