Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures II: the bipartite case
arXiv:1401.4164
Abstract
In a sequence of four papers, we prove the following results (via a unified approach) for all sufficiently large : (i) [1-factorization conjecture] Suppose that is even and . Then every -regular graph on vertices has a decomposition into perfect matchings. Equivalently, . (ii) [Hamilton decomposition conjecture] Suppose that . Then every -regular graph on vertices has a decomposition into Hamilton cycles and at most one perfect matching. (iii) [Optimal packings of Hamilton cycles] Suppose that is a graph on vertices with minimum degree . Then contains at least edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles. Here denotes the degree of the largest even-regular spanning subgraph one can guarantee in a graph on vertices with minimum degree . According to Dirac, (i) was first raised in the 1950s. (ii) and the special case of (iii) answer questions of Nash-Williams from 1970. All of the above bounds are best possible. In the current paper, we prove the above results for the case when is close to a complete balanced bipartite graph.
We originally split the proof into four papers, of which this was the second paper. We have now combined this series into a single publication [arXiv:1401.4159v2], which will appear in the Memoirs of the AMS. 62 pages, 2 figures
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Hamilton cycles in graphs and hypergraphs: an extremal perspective
- Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures III: approximate decompositions
- Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures IV: exceptional systems for the two cliques case
- Packing, Counting and Covering Hamilton cycles in random directed graphs
- Vertex-transitive graphs that have no Hamilton decomposition