Resolving the problem of galaxy clustering on small scales: any new physics needed?
arXiv:1311.2599 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2132
Abstract
Galaxy clustering sets strong constraints on the physics governing galaxy formation and evolution. However, most current models fail to reproduce the clustering of low-mass galaxies on small scales (). In this paper we study the galaxy clusterings predicted from a few semi-analytical models. We firstly compare two Munich versions, Guo et al. (2011, Guo11) and De Lucia \& Blazoit (2007, DLB07). The Guo11 model well reproduces the galaxy stellar mass function, but over-predicts the clustering of low-mass galaxies on small scales. The DLB07 model provides a better fit to the clustering on small scales, but over-predicts the stellar mass function. These seem to be puzzling. We find that there is slightly more fraction of satellite galaxies residing in massive haloes in the Guo11 model, which is the dominant contribution to the clustering discrepancy between the two models. However, both models still over-predict the clustering at for low mass galaxies. This is because both models over-predict the number of satellites by in massive halos than the data. Actually, the better agreement of DLB07 model with the data on small scales comes as a coincidence as it predicts too many low-mass central galaxies which are less clustered and thus bring down the total clustering. Finally, we show the predictions from the semi-analytical of Kang et al. (2012). We find that this model can simultaneously fit the stellar mass function and galaxy clustering if the supernova feedback in satellite galaxies is stronger. We conclude that semi-analytical models are now able to solve the small-scales clustering problem, without invoking of any other new physics or changing the dark matter properties, such as the recent favored warm dark matter.
12 pages, 8 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (14)
- The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies
- A Semi-Analytic Model for the Co-evolution of Galaxies, Black Holes, and Active Galactic Nuclei
- The Importance of Satellite Quenching for the Build-Up of the Red Sequence of Present Day Galaxies
- Assembly bias in the clustering of dark matter haloes
- Towards a Concordant Model of Halo Occupation Statistics
- Simulations of the galaxy population constrained by observations from z=3 to the present day: implications for galactic winds and the fate of their ejecta
- Properties of Galaxy Groups in the SDSS: II.- AGN Feedback and Star Formation Truncation
- The dependence of dark halo clustering on the formation epoch and the concentration parameter
- A Halo Model of Galaxy Colors and Clustering in the SDSS
- The Dependence of Galaxy Formation on Cosmological Parameters: Can we distinguish the WMAP1 and WMAP3 Parameter Sets?
- The Strikingly Similar Relation between Satellite and Central Galaxies and Their Dark Matter Halos Since z=2
- The effect of Warm Dark Matter on galaxy properties: constraints from the stellar mass function and the Tully-Fisher relation
- Bulk flow of halos in ΛCDM simulation
- On the scatter in the relation between stellar mass and halo mass: random or halo formation time dependent?
Cited by in corpus (8)
- First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering
- Semi-Analytic Galaxies - I. Synthesis of environmental and star-forming regulation mechanisms
- Surveying Galaxy Proto-clusters in Emission: A Large-scale Structure at z=2.44 and the Outlook for HETDEX
- Resolution-independent modeling of environmental effects in semi-analytic models of galaxy formation that include ram-pressure stripping of both hot and cold gas
- nIFTy Cosmology: the clustering consistency of galaxy formation models
- The galaxy correlation function as a constraint on galaxy formation physics
- The gap of stellar mass in galaxy groups: another perspective of the Too-big-To-Fail problem in the Milky Way
- CFHTLenS: Galaxy bias as function of scale, stellar mass, and colour. Conflicts with predictions by semi-analytic models