Rewards and the evolution of cooperation in public good games
arXiv:1310.5520 · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0903
Abstract
Properly coordinating cooperation is relevant for resolving public good problems such as clean energy and environmental protection. However, little is known about how individuals can coordinate themselves for a certain level of cooperation in large populations of strangers. In a typical situation, a consensus-building process hardly succeeds due to lack of face and standing. The evolution of cooperation in this type of situation is studied using threshold public good games in which cooperation prevails when it is initially sufficient, or otherwise, it perishes. While punishment is a powerful tool to shape human behaviours, institutional punishment is often too costly to start with only a few contributors, which is another coordination problem. Here we show that whatever the initial conditions, reward funds based on voluntary contribution can evolve. The voluntary reward paves the way for effectively overcoming the coordination problem and efficiently transforms freeloaders to cooperators with a perceived small risk of collective failure.
9 pages, 2 figures
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Antisocial pool rewarding does not deter public cooperation
- Environmental feedback drives cooperation in spatial social dilemmas
- Second-order freeriding on antisocial punishment restores the effectiveness of prosocial punishment
- Voluntary rewards mediate the evolution of pool punishment for maintaining public goods in large populations
- Solving the collective-risk social dilemma with risky assets in well-mixed and structured populations
- Reciprocity-based cooperative phalanx maintained by overconfident players
- Evolutionary dynamics in state-feedback public goods games with peer punishment
- Cheater-altruist synergy in immunopathogenic ecological public goods games
- Evolution of cooperation and costly incentives in the continuous snowdrift game