Opinion dynamics and wisdom under out-group discrimination
arXiv:1306.3134 · doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2016.02.005
Abstract
We study a DeGroot-like opinion dynamics model in which agents may oppose other agents. As an underlying motivation, in our setup, agents want to adjust their opinions to match those of the agents of their 'in-group' and, in addition, they want to adjust their opinions to match the 'inverse' of those of the agents of their 'out-group'. Our paradigm can account for persistent disagreement in connected societies as well as bi- and multi-polarization. Outcomes depend upon network structure and the choice of deviation function modeling the mode of opposition between agents. For a particular choice of deviation function, which we call soft opposition, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for long-run polarization. We also consider social influence (who are the opinion leaders in the network?) as well as the question of wisdom in our naive learning paradigm, finding that wisdom is difficult to attain when there exist sufficiently strong negative relations between agents.
Further slight/minor ameliorations throughout. Also, fixed a small error in Example 3.1
References in corpus (5)
- Opinion fluctuations and disagreement in social networks
- Is there negative social influence? Disentangling effects of dissimilarity and disliking on opinion shifts
- Social Influences in Opinion Dynamics: the Role of Conformity
- Rebels Lead to the Doctrine of the Mean: Opinion Dynamic in a Heterogeneous DeGroot Model
- The Evolution of Beliefs over Signed Social Networks