Role of HIV RNA structure in recombination and speciation: romping in purine A, keeps HTLV away
arXiv:1305.2132 · doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2013.10.017
Abstract
Extreme enrichment of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) RNA genome for the purine A parallels the mild purine-loading of the RNAs of most organisms. This should militate against loop-loop "kissing" interactions between the structured viral genome and structured host RNAs, which can generate segments of double-stranded RNA sufficient to trigger intracellular alarms. However, human T cell leukaemia virus (HTLV-1), with the potential to invade the same host cell, shows extreme enrichment for the pyrimidine C. Assuming the low GC% HIV and the high GC% HTLV-1 to share a common ancestor, it was postulated that differences in GC% arose to prevent homologous recombination between these emerging lentiviral species. Sympatrically isolated by this intracellular reproductive barrier, prototypic HIV-1 seized the AU-rich (low GC%) high ground (thus committing to purine A rather than purine G). Prototypic HTLV-1 forwent this advantage and evolved an independent evolutionary strategy. Evidence supporting this hypothesis since its elaboration in the 1990s is growing. The conflict between the needs to encode accurately both a protein, and nucleic acid structure, is often resolved in favour of the nucleic acid because, apart from regulatory roles, structure is critical for recombination. However, above a sequence difference threshold, structure (and hence recombination) is impaired. New species can then arise.
Initially submitted to the Journal of Theoretical Biology 27th November 2012
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (2)
- Speciation: Goldschmidt's Heresy, Once Supported by Gould and Dawkins, is Again Reinstated
- Elusive preferred hosts or nucleic acid level selection? A commentary on: Evolutionary interpretations of mycobacteriophage biodiversity and host-range through the analysis of codon usage bias (Esposito et al. 2016)