Reply to Comment on "Evidence of Non-Mean-Field-Like Low-Temperature Behavior in the Edwards-Anderson Spin-Glass Model"
arXiv:1304.5210 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.219702
Abstract
In Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 219701 (2013) [arXiv:1211.0843] Billoire et al. criticize the conclusions of our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 177204 (2012), arxiv:1206.0783]. They argue that considering the Edwards-Anderson and Sherrington-Kirkpatrick models at the same temperature is inappropriate and propose an interpretation based on the replica symmetry breaking theory. Here we show that the theory presented in the Comment does not explain our data on the Edwards-Anderson spin glass and we stand by our assertion that the low-temperature behavior of the Edwards-Anderson spin glass model does not appear to be mean-field like.
Reply to comment by Billoire et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 219701 (2013) [ariv:1211.0843] on Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 177204 (2012) by Yucesoy et al. [arxiv:1206.0783]
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Evidence against a mean field description of short-range spin glasses revealed through thermal boundary conditions
- Short-range Ising spin glasses: the metastate interpretation of replica symmetry breaking
- Number of thermodynamic states in the three-dimensional Edwards-Anderson spin glass
- The droplet-scaling versus replica symmetry breaking debate in spin glasses revisited
- The classical mutual information in mean-field spin glass models
- Low-temperature behavior of the statistics of the overlap distribution in Ising spin-glass models
- Numerical construction of the Aizenman-Wehr metastate
- Explicit generation of the branching tree of states in spin glasses
- Evidence of many thermodynamic states of the three-dimensional Ising spin glass
- Numerical simulations of Ising spin glasses with free boundary conditions: the role of droplet excitations and domain walls