Relative performance of ancilla verification and decoding in the [[7,1,3]] Steane code
arXiv:1303.4026 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.89.062304
Abstract
Ancilla post-selection is a common means of achieving fault-tolerance in quantum error-correction. However, it can lead to additional data errors due to movement or wait operations. Alternatives to post-selection may achieve lower overall failure rates due to avoiding such errors. We present numerical simulation results comparing the logical error rates for the fault-tolerant [[7,1,3]] Steane code using techniques of ancilla verification vs. the newer method of ancilla decoding, as described in [D.P. DiVincenzo and P. Aliferis, PRL 98, 020501 (2007)]. We simulate QEC procedures in which rhe possibility of ancilla verification failures requires the creation and storage of additional ancillas and/or additional waiting of the data until a new ancilla can be created. We find that the decoding method, which avoids verification failures, is advantageous in terms of overall error rate in various cases, even when measurement operations are no slower than others. We analyze the effect of different classes of physical error on the relative performance of these two methods.
arXiv comment9 pages, 12 figures. v6: fixed metadata typo (paper unchanged). Earlier revisions revised graphs and simulation data, fixed typos, added additional analysis and citations
References in corpus (7)
- Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation
- Good Quantum Error-Correcting Codes Exist
- A Theory of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation
- Overhead and noise threshold of fault-tolerant quantum error correction
- Active stabilisation, quantum computation and quantum state synthesis
- Effective fault-tolerant quantum computation with slow measurements
- Comparison of ancilla preparation and measurement procedures for the Steane [[7,1,3]] code on a model ion trap quantum computer