Quintessence versus phantom dark energy: the arbitrating power of current and future observations
arXiv:1212.5824 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/06/042
Abstract
We analyze the possibility to distinguish between quintessence and phantom scalar field models of dark energy using observations of luminosity distance moduli of SNe Ia, CMB anisotropies and polarization, matter density perturbations and baryon acoustic oscillations. Among the present observations only Planck data on CMB anisotropy and SDSS DR9 data on baryon acoustic oscillations may be able to decide between quintessence or phantom scalar field models, however for each model a set of best-fit parameters exists, which matches all data with similar goodness of fit. We compare the relative differences of best-fit model predictions with observational uncertainties for each type of data and we show that the accuracy of SNe Ia luminosity distance data is far from the one necessary to distinguish these types of dark energy models, while the CMB data (WMAP, ACT, SPT and especially Planck) are close to being able to reliably distinguish them. Also an improvement of the large-scale structure data (future releses of SDSS BOSS and e.g. Euclid or BigBOSS) will enable us to surely decide between quintessence and phantom dark energy.
16 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in JCAP
References in corpus (12)
- Dynamics of dark energy
- Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
- Improved Distances to Type Ia Supernovae with Multicolor Light Curve Shapes: MLCS2k2
- Primordial Nucleosynthesis in the Precision Cosmology Era
- SNLS3: Constraints on Dark Energy Combining the Supernova Legacy Survey Three Year Data with Other Probes
- The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Final data release and cosmological results
- Second Season QUIET Observations: Measurements of the CMB Polarization Power Spectrum at 95 GHz
- Cosmic Acceleration, Dark Energy and Fundamental Physics
- Dark Energy in Practice
- Do the cosmological observational data prefer phantom dark energy?
- Supernova light-curve fitters and Dark Energy
- Properties and uncertainties of scalar field models of dark energy with barotropic equation of state
Cited by in corpus (11)
- Theoretical and observational constraints of viable f(R) theories of gravity
- Constraining the dynamical dark energy parameters: Planck-2013 vs WMAP9
- Sound speed of scalar field dark energy: weak effects and large uncertainties
- A one-parameter formula for testing slow-roll dark energy: observational prospects
- Dynamical aspects for scalar fields coupled to cubic contractions of the Riemann tensor
- Parametrizing the transition to the phantom epoch with Supernovae Ia and Standard Rulers
- The observational constraints on the flat CDM models
- Dark Energy on Astrophysical Scales and Its Detection in the Milky Way
- Bayesian model selection for dark energy using weak lensing forecasts
- Dynamics of dark energy in the gravitational fields of matter inhomogeneities
- Test particle motion around a black hole dressed with a spherically symmetric stationary fluid