Correspondence between future-included and future-not-included theories

Abstract

We briefly review the correspondence principle proposed in our previous paper, which claims that if we regard a matrix element defined in terms of the future state at time $T_B$ and the past state at time $T_A$ as an expectation value in the complex action theory whose path runs over not only past but also future, the expectation value at the present time $t$ of a future-included theory for large $T_B-t$ and large $t-T_A$ corresponds to that of a future-not-included theory with a proper inner product for large $t-T_A$. This correspondence principle suggests that the future-included theory is not excluded phenomenologically.

10 pages, references added, to appear in the proceedings of the 15th workshop "What Comes Beyond the Standard Models", Bled, Slovenia, Jul.9-19, 2012

References in corpus (5)

• Degenerate vacua from unification of second law of thermodynamics with other laws
• Remarkable Relation from Minimal Imaginary Action Model
• Card game restriction in LHC can only be successful!
• Phase Transitions and Moduli Space Topology
• Theory Including Future Not Excluded -- Formulation of Complex Action Theory II --

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Complex action suggests future-included theory
• Reality from maximizing overlap in the future-included theories
• Momentum relation and classical limit in the future-not-included complex action theory
• Influence from Future, Arguments