Card game restriction in LHC can only be successful!

Abstract

We argue that a restriction determined by a drawn card or quantum random numbers, on the running of LHC (Large Hadron Collider), which was proposed in earlier articles by us, can only result in an, at first, apparent success whatever the outcome. This previous work was concerned with looking for backward causation and/or influence from the future, which, in our previous model, was assumed to have the effect of arranging bad luck for large Higgs producing machines, such as LHC and the never finished SSC (Superconducting Super Collider) stopped by Congress because of such bad luck, so as not to allow them to work.

13 pages; a reference corrected; v3:typos in title page fixed

References in corpus (3)

• Nonlocality as an Explanation for Finetuning and Field replication in Nature
• Influence from the Future
• An iterated search for influence from the future on the Large Hadron Collider

Cited by in corpus (8)

• Theory Including Future Not Excluded -- Formulation of Complex Action Theory II --
• Correspondence between future-included and future-not-included theories
• Complex action suggests future-included theory
• Reality from maximizing overlap in the future-included theories
• LHC card games: bringing about retrocausality?
• Momentum relation and classical limit in the future-not-included complex action theory
• AP Theory III: Cone-like Graded SUSY, Dynamic Dark Energy and the YM Millenium Problem
• Influence from Future, Arguments