Closing the detection loophole in multipartite Bell tests using GHZ states
arXiv:1208.0622 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.86.062111
Abstract
We investigate the problem of closing the detection loophole in multipartite Bell tests, and show that the required detection efficiencies can be significantly lowered compared to the bipartite case. In particular, we present Bell tests based on n-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states, which can tolerate efficiencies as low as 38% for a reasonable number of parties and measurements. Even in the presence of a significant amount of noise, efficiencies below 50% can be tolerated, which is encouraging given recent experimental progress. Finally we give strong evidence that, for a sufficiently large number of parties and measurements, arbitrarily small efficiencies can be tolerated, even in the presence of an arbitrary large amount of noise.
5 pages, 3 figures
References in corpus (34)
- Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
- Random Numbers Certified by Bell's Theorem
- Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states
- Non-locality and Communication Complexity
- All multipartite Bell correlation inequalities for two dichotomic observables per site
- Observation of eight-photon entanglement
- Private Randomness Expansion With Untrusted Devices
- Experimental realization of Dicke states of up to six qubits for multiparty quantum networking
- Classification of multi-qubit mixed states: separability and distillability properties
- Experimental entanglement of a six-photon symmetric Dicke state
- Closing the detection loophole in Bell experiments using qudits
- Loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment via quantum steering
- Conclusive quantum steering with superconducting transition edge sensors
- Quantum Communication between N partners and Bell's inequalities
- Experimentally faking the violation of Bell's inequalities
- Arbitrarily loss-tolerant Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering allowing a demonstration over 1 km of optical fiber with no detection loophole
- Detection loophole in asymmetric Bell experiments
- Observation of tunable Popescu-Rohrlich correlations through post-selection of a gaussian state
- Minimum detection efficiency for a loophole-free atom-photon Bell experiment
- Detection Loophole in Bell experiments: How post-selected local correlations can look non-local
- Fully nonlocal, monogamous, and random genuinely multipartite quantum correlations
- Necessary and sufficient detection efficiency for the Mermin inequalities
- Fully Distrustful Quantum Cryptography
- Strict detector-efficiency bounds for n-site Clauser-Horne inequalities
- Heralded generation of multiphoton entanglement
- Multisetting Bell-type inequalities for detecting genuine tripartite entanglement
- Combinatorics and Quantum Nonlocality
- Large violation of Bell inequalities using both particle and wave measurements
- Experimental amplification of an entangled photon: what if the detection loophole is ignored?
- Loophole-free Bell test based on local precertification of photon's presence
- Feasibility of loophole-free nonlocality tests with a single photon
- Robust nonlocality tests with displacement-based measurements
- Using macroscopic entanglement to close the detection loophole in Bell inequality
- Optimal measurement bases for Bell-tests based on the CH-inequality
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Bell nonlocality
- Bell inequalities violated using detectors of low efficiency
- Decoherence Effects on the Non-locality of Symmetric States
- Exponentially decreasing critical detection efficiency for any Bell inequality
- Closing the detection loophole in tripartite Bell tests using the W state
- Graph-theoretic approach to Bell experiments with low detection efficiency
- Closing the detection loophole in multipartite Bell experiments with a limited number of efficient detectors
- Tight detection efficiency bounds of Bell tests in no-signaling theories
- Detection Efficiency Bounds in (Semi-)Device-Independent Scenarios
- How Likely Are You to Observe Non-locality with Imperfect Detection Efficiency and Random Measurement Settings?