On the Debate Concerning the Proper Characterisation of Quantum Dynamical Evolution
arXiv:1206.3794 · doi:10.1086/673733
Abstract
There has been a long-standing and sometimes passionate debate between physicists over whether a dynamical framework for quantum systems should incorporate not completely positive (NCP) maps in addition to completely positive (CP) maps. Despite the reasonableness of the arguments for complete positivity, we argue that NCP maps should be allowed, with a qualification: these should be understood, not as reflecting 'not completely positive' evolution, but as linear extensions, to a system's entire state space, of CP maps that are only partially defined. Beyond the domain of definition of a partial-CP map, we argue, much may be permitted.
To be presented at the 2012 biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (PSA), San Diego, California
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Why initial system-environment correlations do not imply the failure of complete positivity: a causal perspective
- The Open Systems View and the Everett Interpretation
- Measure of not-completely-positive qubit maps: the general case
- Quantum entanglement, local indicators and effect of external fields in the Kugel-Khomskii model
- On the Physical Explanation for Quantum Computational Speedup
- Limitations of the Markovian approximation in the harmonic oscillator
- On the Necessity of Entanglement for the Explanation of Quantum Speedup