Reply to "Comment on 'Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations' "

Abstract

In this reply I address the comment by W-Y. Hwang and O. Gittsovich on my paper [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 82}, 032313 (2010)]. The authors of the comment point out that I use implicit assumption that the alphabet of the eavesdropper is binary. They claim that such assumption is unrealistic. Here I show that even without this assumption the main result of my paper still holds.

for the comment see arXiv:1204.4235

References in corpus (2)

• Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations
• Comment on "Security Proof for Cryptographic Protocols Based Only on Monogamy of Bell's Inequality Violations"

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Quantum key distribution protocol based on contextuality monogamy
• A simple relation of guessing probability in quantum key distribution
• Security of device-independent quantum key distribution via monogamy relations from multipartite information causality