The string landscape and low energy supersymmetry
arXiv:1204.6626 · doi:10.1142/9789814412551_0012
Abstract
We briefly survey our present understanding of the string landscape, and use it to discuss the chances that we will see low energy supersymmetry at the LHC.
27 pp, ws-rv9x6.cls (included) v2: improved section 6
References in corpus (6)
- Non-thermal Dark Matter and the Moduli Problem in String Frameworks
- Computational complexity of the landscape I
- Statistical analysis of the supersymmetry breaking scale
- Domain walls, near-BPS bubbles, and probabilities in the landscape
- Compactified String Theories -- Generic Predictions for Particle Physics
- Hyperconifold Transitions, Mirror Symmetry, and String Theory
Cited by in corpus (22)
- Atomic Classification of 6D SCFTs
- A non Supersymmetric SO(10) Grand Unified Model for All the Physics below
- A Minimal Non-Supersymmetric Model: Gauge Coupling Unification, Proton Decay and Fermion masses
- Supersymmetry, Nonthermal Dark Matter and Precision Cosmology
- The Higgs: so simple yet so unnatural
- The Higgs mass and natural supersymmetric spectrum from the landscape
- Computational complexity of the landscape II - Cosmological considerations
- Inflationary Constraints on Late Time Modulus Dominated Cosmology
- Cosmology in the presence of multiple light moduli
- Inflationary Predictions and Moduli Masses
- Superparticle phenomenology from the natural mini-landscape
- Supersymmetry Breaking and the Cosmological Constant
- The Dark Universe after Reheating in String Inflation
- Inflation on a Slippery Slope
- Global structure of the multiverse and the measure problem
- Is Eternal Inflation Past-Eternal? And What if It Is?
- GUTs without guts
- The SM and SUSY after the 2011 LHC results
- Black holes and up-tunneling suppress Boltzmann brains
- Duality Constraints on String Theory: Instantons and spectral networks
- Naturalness as a reasonable scientific principle in fundamental physics
- From Algebraic Geometry to Machine Learning